
It is with a heavy heart that I delve into the fetid miasma of 'Da Vinci Code Controversy'. I had hoped this miserable plague would remain here in the States but the stench emanating from this re-flaggellated horse's carcass crosses all oceans, befouls all nations. It's a stink with a mission.
Obviously, the movie's mission is to exploit people's religious insanity in order to seperate individuals from their money.
This is news?
The Vatican has been doing this for centuries- I think they're upset that Hollywood is better at selling bullshit than they are. It's not really a fair fight- Hollywood has computer graphics and FX and sexy people and the Church isn't really big on explosions and sex - I mean , really, it's still using smoke signals to announce leadership changes. That's not a real winner with the ADD IPod crowd, and nothing-not even a childhood enthusiasm for Nazism- can make Pope Ratzo sexy.
Maybe they could get Mel Gibson to do Passion 2: Beyond Revelation- that would help even things out, I think. It'd make a better video game than Passion 1, that's for sure. That game sucked- I kept getting killed at the end.
Anyway, the Leonardo thing...
When my then-girlfriend first picked up the book she thought I'd love it- me being a long-time conspiracy geek and such- but she was wrong.
I lost interest almost immediately.
"Here we go again with the Grail as Womb and wotnot" , I thought. I'm not sure where I first encountered the idea of JC and Magdelene spawning , but it sure as hell wasn't a Dan Brown novel. Garth Ennis wrote about it in a comic book- Preacher, I think it was called, but it was wasn't new then...it's an old idea- it's almost as worn-out as the Rosicrucians, Knights Templar and assorted Bavarian Illuminati theories. Like those old conspiracies, it might be true it it might not be- but so what? It doesn't matter one whit either way- you buy a ticket and go to the cinema, you pay a tithe and purchase salvation- it's all about the money.
Why the uproar? People are trying to pass laws against showing the movie. This is clearly insane- is there a law requiring one to see this movie? Just don't go.
The novel and the Bible are both fiction loosely based on historical record. I doubt if any serious, rational theologians hold the Bible to be 100% literal truth as told, just as only the most naive reader of fiction will take all of Brown's recycled nonsense as fact.
Stories is stories, is all.
Wouldn't a truly faithful Christian just give a tolerant shrug and move on to better causes-like helping the poor and teaching the kids and other Jesus-y things? I don't believe in all that Messiah hooplah, but when I think of Jesus the Man, I have a positive image of a guy who really enjoyed helping people and accepting the differences of others and stuff. It just makes sense that he'd be sleeping with Magdalene- they spent a lot of time together and that sort of thing tends to happen, you know...
But no, say the God Nuts. Heresy!
Huh? You can accept that the Guy could walk on water but not the concept of a Holy Boner?
It's pretty well established that there is a historical figure named Jesus and that he was a man.
Perhaps you know some men- you may even be a man yourself. In any case , you know that men do gross , offensive stuff.
All men.
Even Jesus. Why is this so difficult to understand?
Da Vinci vs. The Bible?
That's like Star Wars vs. Star Trek- they are both OK if you like that sort of thing, but it's really dumb and dorky to argue about.


















