YOU ARE BEING WATCHED
Didja see this? I know YDG did.
Seems this 14-year old girl posted a "death threat" on the Preznit's life on her myspace blog , but removed it nearly 18 months ago, after finding out that making such threats is illegal.
It took the Secret Service nearly a year and a half to track this girl down, eventually nabbing her in her secret terror lab, er, high school biology class.
What took them so long to find her?
Paperwork.
No kidding- until today, the Government had to follow certain procedures and protocols when questioning U.S. citizens, you had a right known as habeas corpus,which prevented the Government from arbitrarily imprisoning you without showing cause and providing due process. In this girl's case, it's likely that her website was reported by a third party and given a suitably low assignment priority by the Service... eventually someone's caseload queue was due for review-and the law does require the SS to investigate any reported threats- so they had to send a couple goons to intimidate the kid- now they can get their paperwork signed and move on. They were probably not terribly happy about having to waste time hassling a kid, but the paperwork needed to be done.
The girl didn't really have much to worry about, she had the Constitution to protect her from unlawful imprisonment and it's parasitic twin, torture.
In Brown v. Vasquez, 952 F.2d 1164, 1166 (9th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1778 (1992), the court observed that the Supreme Court has "recognized the fact that`[t]he writ of habeas corpus is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action.'
Now that BushCo has removed that safeguard, the Service doesn't need to follow any sort of procedure, there is no check on what they can do. If Bush says that girl is an enemy combatant, he is within his rights to order her imprisoned and questioned, for as long as he wants, without giving her so much as a reason for doing it. He doesn't need to tell her parents.
A lawyer or right to counsel? Forget it!
One phone call? Ha!
The right to question why you are being held?
Fair trial?
Har! That's so 1787.
So pre-9/11.
Now that the bill has been signed, how long will it be before the first person is abducted and imprisoned without cause or counsel?
It may have already happened. How would we know?
There's no accountabilty, there's no power for the detainee to appeal to.
In theory, Bush could have his critics whisked away to secret CIA fun camps, just for speaking against him- or his opponents held for voting against his policies.
Will it come to that? Eventually it will, if not by Bush, then by someone else.
Anybody remember Dick Nixon? He sure as hell would have started rounding people up if he could have. Man, he'd have loved this new bill...
This new power will either get revoked or it will get abused.
Power always gets abused unless checked.
Always.
Or should I say 'further abused'?
5 comments:
yup..did a post on her..my new heroine...14 and got it all together..
I know I've said it a hundred times,but...Any person,or group of persons that want to see our way of life destroyed,need only kick back and relax while our own government goes about the systematic business of dismantling the constitution,and bill of rights.
YDG- yes, it was a good post too!
Sling, that's why basic college courses are called '101'- you have to state the obvious one hundred and ONE times before the students start noticing...
Our Corporation-er, um- 'Government' and it's Evangelical flunkies are the only extant group that hates our freedoms- everyone else hates our FOREIGN POLICY.
it's just too easy for king george!
there's no middle class to protest any more.
the rich are happy with what they have and the poor are too busy trying to survive to mount an effective opposition against all the bullshit george is getting away with.
keep up the good fight!!
I'm afraid that they already imprison without due process from stuff I've read that appears credible, or at least makes me question.
I have to disagree with you ruby. I am constantly amazed at how many of those who would benefit most under democratic vs republic rule vote republican. You ask them specifics on certain points and they are democratic minded, but they still choose to cast the vote with republicans because of principles they misguidedly believe the republican party holds and because of the republican propaganda they have swallowed as to what those parties stand for.
Post a Comment