Showing posts with label throw the bastards out. Show all posts
Showing posts with label throw the bastards out. Show all posts

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Advanced Technique

The painting below is on display at Cambodia's Tuol Sleng Prison, which is currently serving as a Torture Museum, a reminder of the horrors perpetrated by Pol Pot's despotic regime. The artist is Vann Nath, a former inmate.


According to John Dean, there are at least ten preliminary investigations regarding the CIA's destruction of ' advanced interrogation' videotapes, tapes on which waterboarding and other 'advanced' techniques are demonstrated.

There are more than a few things wrong with the 'official story', whatever that is at the moment. Like the reasons behind the Iraqi occupation, the rationale for torture and the subsequent obstruction of justice seems to change over time.

- The initial BushCo defense, that the tapes were destroyed to protect the ID of CIA agents, is laughable. First, Cheney didn't hesitate to out Valerie Plame, who was an honest-to-Godzilla anti-terrorist secret agent; second, doesn't the CIA have the ability to pixelate images?
If pixelation is too high-tech for our CIA, couldn't they simply take a cue from the terrorists they are supposed to be monitoring and wear ski masks?

- In the course of the waterboarding discussion, defenders of 'advanced techniques' like to claim that valuable anti-terrorist information was obtained using 'advanced' methods...that assertion reeks of bullshit. If we obtained such invaluable data during these 'advanced' sessions, why were all the tapes destroyed? Shouldn't that valuable data be preserved?

-In typical BushSpeak, what are called "advanced techniques" aren't advanced at all. Water torture has been used for thousands of years- it's about as basic as you can get. See that painting, above? That is waterboarding. All you need is water, a blindfold and a victim. Gravity does the work for you.

- Here's a scary thought : Some of the 'advanced' sessions were held with terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks. Perhaps, under torture, they gave up information that connected certain 9/11 dots, dots that BushCo would rather not have connected. These are not hard dots to connect.

In other Bad News:

- I am listening to George Bush on live TV and I find, to my horror, that I agree with him on something:
The Democratic Congress sucks at their collective job.
My reasons for believing this are different than his, however. Bush is upset that Congress waited until the last minute to collapse into jelly...I am pissed off that they caved in at all.
Not surprised, but pissed nonetheless...

- Bush just used the term 'shooters' to refer to soldiers from allied nations who are stationed in Afghanistan...'shooters' is the term used by Blackwater and other mercenary corporations to describe their combat employees. Calling a real soldier a 'shooter' is a show of disrespect.
To be precise, Bush said he was "grateful for the shooters"...perhaps he meant the Jello shooters that Pelosi and Reid were serving last night.

- He just called what we did to Iraq "bestowing the blessing of liberty".
I have to admit that the Second Amendment seems pretty healthy in Iraq...perhaps that is what he means.

-What was Dick Cheney's staff burning?

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Boil Away

I once worked in a Big Insurance office that was being closed down. I was working as a temp, processing claims from Hurricane Isabel, and was one of the last people to actually occupy the building. One of my final tasks was to box up all the office supplies left over from the Isabel Catastrophe operation (which once consisted of 300+ workers) and arrange for a company truck to take them back to the Catastrophe Team Warehouse.
Some items were deemed disposable - too expensive to ship back and re-distribute- and were to be discarded.
One of those items were the loose ballpoint pens. There were three Zip-Loc freezer bags full of pens- probably 1,500 or more- and it didn't feel right to throw away so many perfectly good writing sticks.
I had been reading a website that was collecting "care packages" for the troops in Iraq and one of the Army chaplains had written an email on behalf of the local schools. He said something akin to :
" We need pens and paper. Entire classes are sharing a single pencil and there is no paper. "
There was a military APO to send stationary and supplies to.

I thought it would be a great idea to send these pens ( and pads, pencils, staplers etc) to this chaplain in Baghdad- I mean , we were gonna throw 'em away- so I told my boss what I was doing.

"No! You are not doing that."

"But why? It's a good cause."

"I'm not debating that. But those pens all have the Company logo on them and if one of those pens winds up inside a terrorist car-bomb, it'll be my ass that gets hanged."

I thought he was being a bit paranoid, but I saw his point about the logo. A few people were starting to realize that the war was going badly and the boss was a bit leery of putting the Company in a position where it looked like it was sponsoring the war.

So I sorted out the 100 or so pens that didn't have the logo on them and sent them anonymously to the chaplain. The rest I kept, gave away or donated to the radio station.
I had forgotten all about it until I read about the Executive Order signed by Bush on 17 July:

"I have issued an Executive Order blocking property of persons determined to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq or undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people."
The new Executive Order authorizes the Sec. or Treasury to seize the property and economic assets of any American citizen who is "threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq...undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq..," or those who "have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of...[people who do bad things].
(It's interesting that the European press caught this story but the American media has ignored it. It's also a bit ironic that Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush, had his assets frozen for trading with the Nazis in WWII.)

Under this new order, I would be afraid to send those pens to the chaplain - what if one of the pens fell into the wrong hands and the ballpoint spring was used to create a detonator for a roadside bomb? My vast fortune would be seized by the Treasury Dept.

But the real target of this order are anti-war groups and organizations. It will be interesting to see if BushCo invokes this New Order to punish Cindy Sheehan for having the temerity to publicly point out the obvious. Sheehan, you may have heard, was arrested yesterday after being told by John Conyers (D-Wuss) that Congress "doesn't have the votes" to impeach Bush.
I would submit to Mr. Conyers that the Founders intended for us to exercise the checks and balances built into our Constitution - use 'em or lose 'em- and that impeachment is needed right now- but I digress.

Speak out about the war? The right-wingnuts often call that "undermining" the efforts, so it's possible BushCo might try to freeze the assets of Sheehan and any group ( CodePink, AfterDowning Street, Move On et. al.) or individual who assisted or supported her in any way.

If that Executive Order isn't scary enough, read this:

Just last month new legislation was signed which declares that in the event of a "catastrophic event", the President can take total control over the government and the country, bypassing all other levels of government at the state, federal, local, territorial and tribal levels, and thus ensuring total unprecedented dictatorial power.

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, which also places the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic "security", was signed on May 9th without the approval or oversight of Congress and seemingly supercedes the National Emergency Act which allows the president to declare a national emergency but also requires that Congress have the authority to "modify, rescind, or render dormant" such emergency authority if it believes the president has acted inappropriately.


If you follow the link above, you will find the official White House release. At the end , it chillingly notes that the rest of the Order is classified- by Executive Order.

Rep. Peter DiFazio (D-OR) recently asked the White House for access to the classified Bush plan of action in case of another terrorist attack. DiFazio, who sits on the House Homeland Security Committee, had his request denied.

The White House didn't want to admit that it had a secret plan, and now that we know it exists, the Bush administration won't tell us what it is.
I wonder if it involves these Halliburton-built concentration camps?

Republican Ron Paul said this in 2005, regarding a Bush proposal to declare martial law in case of an Avian Flu epidemic:

"To me it's so strange that the President can make these proposals and it's even plausible. When he talks about martial law dealing with some epidemic that might come later on and having forced quarantines, doing away with Posse Comitatus in order to deal with natural disasters, and hardly anybody says anything. People must be scared to death."
To me it's strange that Bush is still President. He has recently declared himself and Cheney to be above and exempt from the law:

Domestically, they're no longer even trying to hide their aversion to democracy and the Constitution. With his new Executive Order on "executive privilege," for example, Bush openly proclaims that he is untouchable by the rule of law; now there are only two branches of government-- the Legislative Branch is ignored as irrelevant -- and Cheney/Bush more or less control them both. More on this issue [here].


So without consulting Congress or notifying the public, BushCo has signed laws that , in the case of certain events (such as a terrorist attack), gives the President unchecked power over the entire government- he becomes the the government- and if you don't like it, you might be "undermining" the war effort and have your property stolen.

Stephen Pizzo calls this the "boiling the frog" method of destroying our Constitution. You place a frog in a pan of water and slowly turn up the heat. By the time the frog realizes the water is lethal, it's too late to jump.

Soup's on!

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Cindy in the Park

This afternoon Cindy Sheehan gave a speech in my front yard.
There was a peace rally at Byrd Park, which is only a few blocks from my apartment, so I braved the perfect weather and went to hear her. At first , I thought the event was canceled because I didn't see the gathering on the other side of the artificial lake.



No cars on this side of the lake.
Lots of cars on the other side.
Where is the rally?


Not here.
I hear a bongo drum in the distance. Bomp. Once.
Maybe over there?

Here it is.

The last I heard, Sheehan had 'retired' from marches and rallies, but she's been stirring it up lately. I didn't know that she had been banned from the Daily Kos for threatening to run as an independent against Nancy Pelosi for her seat at the House of Representatives or that she recently moved an appearance in Charlotte because of concern over violence from a pro-war group called "Gathering of Eagles."

On the GoE website one person left this comment in reference to Sheehan: "Eagles have been known to kill rodents". Another comment claims that the "vast silent majority of Americans" support the war.

Really?

I'm sick of war.

How about you?

Peace.





Out.

Friday, June 08, 2007

Congress Reads This?

Does Congress read my blog? I hope so.

Yesterday, I had two hits from the House of Representatives, both resulting from a post in which I praised Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) and four others for their support of HR 333, a bill to hold impeachment hearings for Dick Cheney.

Perhaps it was a member of Ms. Clarke's staff, perhaps it was one of her opponents- if it was the former, please pass my sincere thanks to Rep. Clarke and her colleagues for trying to do the job that we, the people, hired them to do; if it was the latter, you'd do well to start serving the people and not your corporate masters-I know it must be difficult to make ends meet on a Congressional salary without accepting graft and bribes, but give it a try. While you do that, consider that millions of Americans work many more hours than you do and earn considerably less, and yet they manage to survive- unless they get sick and have no health insurance or can't find work and opt to enlist in the military- then the survival rates start dropping.

Here's a crazy idea: Let's stop spending billions of dollars a day on destroying Iraq and antagonizing the rest of the world and spend some of that money on American citizens.
Universal Health Care is cheaper- much cheaper- than a sustained war of occupation, and it's certainly better for the long-term prospects of our nation.

Education? Let's make sure that any kid who wants to go to college can. If we become a notion of unlearned and unread drop-outs (and that's where we are heading) we will soon join the Third World. Do you want your child emigrating to Saudi Arabia to find work as a taxi driver?
Don't think it can't happen.

Congress needs to know that we are unhappy. One election was not enough - the powers that cost us 3,500 American deaths, unknown trillions of dollars and our international standing in the world community are still in control and I fear that there is nothing that they won't do to maintain that control.

These are people who would willingly, knowingly, start a deadly, endless war in order to achieve their goals, which include unlimited wealth, unchecked power and a cowed and submissive U.S. citizenry.
Mission Accomplished.

Those secret 2001 Energy Task Force meetings that Cheney won't release details of?

I'd wager that the entire PNAC plan to invade Iraq, thus disrupting world oil supplies and causing a dramatic rise in oil prices and profitability was a hot topic at those clandestine meetings.

The war in Iraq was NEVER intended to lower the price of gasoline (no one makes money on lower prices), it was , among other things, designed to RAISE the price of gas from a Clintonesque 95 cents a gallon to an Exxon-friendly $3.25.

I'd also place money on the idea that representatives from the Coal Lobby were on hand, shoveling coal as an "alternative fuel", asking for and receiving Government subsidies to produce a fuel that is far more environmentally harmful and expensive to produce than gasoline .

We, as citizens, have every right to know what was said at those meetings and we have the right to "fire" any elected officials who have introduced and/or supported the lies and deceptions that led us into the mess in Iraq.

If you agree, blog it. Maybe Congress will hear you.



Domain Name
house.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address
143.231.249.# (Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives)
ISP
Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives
Location
Continent: North America
Country: United States (Facts)
State: District of Columbia
City: Washington
Lat/Long: 38.8933, -77.0146 (Map)
Language
English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System
Microsoft WinXP

Jun 7 2007 10:19:24 am
Domain Name
house.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address
143.231.249.# (Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives)
ISP
Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives
Location
Continent: North America
Country: United States (Facts)
State: District of Columbia
City: Washington
Lat/Long: 38.8933, -77.0146 (Map)
Language
English (U.S.)
en-us
Referring URL
http://www.ask.com/blogsearch?qsrc=28&o=0&l=dir&q=Yvette%20D.%20Clarke
Search Engine
ask.com
Search Words
yvette d. clarke
Jun 7 2007 12:31:14 pm
Visit Entry Page
http://camelsback23.blogspot.com/2007/06/crashing-burning-and-politics.html

Don't be silent.